Search found 20 matches

by aekloic
Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:38 am
Forum: Logistics SD
Topic: Foreign trades information not copied in billing
Replies: 4
Views: 948

Re: Foreign trades information not copied in billing

Ok, I have already done this customizing :(

I think I have just one thing to do : open an OSS message.
by aekloic
Wed Apr 11, 2012 2:46 am
Forum: Logistics SD
Topic: Foreign trades information not copied in billing
Replies: 4
Views: 948

Re: Foreign trades information not copied in billing

It sounds like the settings in either VI49 or OVE7 may not be done correctly for that direction. Also, what about the foreign trade proposal for business transaction type? It too is by sales org and country. Thanks for your feedback, I have checked again the VI49 and OVE7 and it is the same as the ...
by aekloic
Tue Apr 10, 2012 6:57 am
Forum: Logistics SD
Topic: Foreign trades information not copied in billing
Replies: 4
Views: 948

Foreign trades information not copied in billing

Hello all, I have got a strange issue and I'm wondering where is the problem. Context foreign trade process (FR to BE) For the company / sales org A, when I have a foreign process from FR to BE, the foreign trade are correctly determinated in the delivery, but when the invoice is created in referenc...
by aekloic
Wed Sep 15, 2010 8:19 am
Forum: Environment, Health & Safety (EH&S)
Topic: DG process & checks in Purchase Order
Replies: 0
Views: 6030

DG process & checks in Purchase Order

Hi all, I want to know if is possible (in standard :)) to implement checks in Purchase Order related to Dangerous Goods Master as it is done Sales Order (or Shipment) ? All the customizig tasks I have found for dangerous goods, of dangerous schema are not available for "MM". thanks in advance for yo...
by aekloic
Tue Sep 29, 2009 1:09 am
Forum: Logistics PM
Topic: Status system CNF / PCNF in Repair Work Order
Replies: 8
Views: 4822

Re: Status system CNF / PCNF in Repair Work Order

Hello Pete, Thanks to your differents axes of analysis, I have found the reason of my issue. In fact, in my operation control key, I have filled the flag 'schedulling' and the confirmation attribute is ''Confirmation possible but not necessary'. So when an operation which is scheduled, and it is con...
by aekloic
Wed Sep 23, 2009 9:09 am
Forum: Logistics PM
Topic: Status system CNF / PCNF in Repair Work Order
Replies: 8
Views: 4822

Re: Status system CNF / PCNF in Repair Work Order

I used the same operation control key in both case.
For this operation control key, the confirmation property is 'Confirmation possible but not necessary'.

Loïc
by aekloic
Wed Sep 23, 2009 5:55 am
Forum: Logistics PM
Topic: Status system CNF / PCNF in Repair Work Order
Replies: 8
Views: 4822

Re: Status system CNF / PCNF in Repair Work Order

Hello Pete, thanks for your answer, any others rules exists ? Because for my case, I have an Repair Work Order, with 8 operations, I have confirmed the operation 0010, with the final confirmation flag filled. The status of my Work Order is CNF, why ? In another Repair Work Order, I confirmed also ju...
by aekloic
Tue Sep 22, 2009 11:22 pm
Forum: Logistics PM
Topic: Status system CNF / PCNF in Repair Work Order
Replies: 8
Views: 4822

Re: Status system CNF / PCNF in Repair Work Order

Yes it is system status, sorry for my mistake.

So could you help me to understand how the status CNF & PCNF are managed in repair work order ?

Thx

Loïc
by aekloic
Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:38 am
Forum: Logistics PM
Topic: Status system CNF / PCNF in Repair Work Order
Replies: 8
Views: 4822

Status system CNF / PCNF in Repair Work Order

Hello all, I need your help for an issue that I do not understand... After a time confirmation from IW41 or IW42, my repair work order is not updated in the same way. Sometimes, the status system CNFP is activated, sometimes, it is the status CONF. After a quick analysis, it seems that this behavior...
by aekloic
Tue Jul 07, 2009 8:29 am
Forum: SRM Supplier Relationship Management
Topic: Shopping cart po table
Replies: 2
Views: 4868

Re: Shopping cart po table

I don't remenber exactly the tables names (it starts with CDRMD*), but you can found them from the transaction BBP_PD.
by aekloic
Tue Jul 07, 2009 4:26 am
Forum: Logistics MM
Topic: GR in blocked stock of material in transit & stock project
Replies: 1
Views: 686

GR in blocked stock of material in transit & stock project

Hello all, Actually, I do not manage to make a GR (movement 101) in a blocked stock of material in transit & stock project (realised after a movement 351 Q). The following error message is triggered : " Stock data of serial number xx not suitable for movement Message no. IO 231 " I do not understand...
by aekloic
Fri Jul 03, 2009 9:08 am
Forum: Logistics PM
Topic: Relationships defined in a Maintenance task list
Replies: 10
Views: 1053

Re: Relationships defined in a Maintenance task list

In fact, I have found the issue, it is coming from the validity date attached to the relationships :oops:

Thanks Pete for your help & your several analysis
by aekloic
Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:38 am
Forum: Logistics PM
Topic: Relationships defined in a Maintenance task list
Replies: 10
Views: 1053

Re: Relationships defined in a Maintenance task list

Yes, all my operations are integrated.

As you suggest, I should create an OSS Message, but as I'm in a 4.6C version ....

I will keep you inform if I've got an answer.

Thanks for your help.

Loïc
by aekloic
Wed Jul 01, 2009 9:43 am
Forum: Logistics PM
Topic: Relationships defined in a Maintenance task list
Replies: 10
Views: 1053

Re: Relationships defined in a Maintenance task list

I have tested it and it is still not OK. (thanks for your help Pete)

How in customizing, do we manage sheduling with relationships rules ?
by aekloic
Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:05 am
Forum: Logistics PM
Topic: Relationships defined in a Maintenance task list
Replies: 10
Views: 1053

Re: Relationships defined in a Maintenance task list

Yes, we use an exit for the integration of task list in order. But, I have looked quickly the code, and do not see anything about relationships (integration or not).